27 replies to this topic

[magneto]

Thanks alot man, I understand your technique now

[mantragora]

I made also test on my spider rig model, where there are different polygons with 3,4, 5 or more points. Model = 198,610 polygons/204,156 points.
Mantragora's Python version = 10970 ms
Mantragora's inlineCpp = 234 ms
Gaham's Python = 17865 ms
Graham's inlineCpp = 40 ms

Now starts more interesting part. With Graham's trick, with accessing geometry from another node instead of directly from PythonSOP, there is one surprise:
Mantragora's Python = 14968 ms
Mantragora's inlineCpp = 198 ms
Graham's Python = 27828 ms
Graham's inlineCpp = 5 ms

Both inlineCpp versions speeded-up.. BUT... clear Python solution slowed down by almost half. Now why is that ?

Edited by mantragora, 26 June 2012 - 12:00 AM.

[rdg]

edward, on 24 June 2012 - 08:23 PM, said:

I think Graham's inlinecpp wrapper for getPrimitivesReferencingPoint() should be faster.

So it comes to down to reading the manual first?!

[edward]

Well, I don't know if reading GEO_Detail.h counts as a "manual".