Welcome to od|forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

ikatz001

Members
  • Content count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ikatz001

  • Rank
    Peon

Personal Information

  • Name Isaac
  • Location Mexico City
  1. Ok thanks for your input. I incorrectly assumed that just because a parameter is keyable it would work in a dynamic sim context.
  2. Hey, Nope. I am trying to control where the particles can and cannot escape the tank, via the waterline. (which I understand is supposed to be a new feature in H16 that does just that). Keying the waterline mid sim so you have dynamic control seems to have no effect (as it it is only evaluating at first frame). Any ideas?
  3. Hi all, I am using the new waterline feature in flips in H16. It is working fine at first, but I tried to key the waterline to move up during the simulation and it seems to have no effect. The particles still escape even though they are below the waterline. The simulation only respects the initial waterline level and does not move dynamically as its keyed. Is this normal behavior? Any idea what might be causing this and how to properly move the waterline as the simulation advances? Many Thanks.
  4. Hey Karl, Thanks a bunch! That works great. It's surprising its so hard to find how to use that one.. looked everywhere. If you have a minute, can you please explain a little what you did.. I follow the graph, but dont understand - any value greater than zero you convert from an integer to a float and export back to mask? why? Is the volumevopoutput doing anything there is was it just left over from something else? I also had the naming wrong in the fluidsurface node, missing the @name= Im confused when it needs that and when you can just put in the name there like a variable.. I will look more into it.
  5. Hi all, Does anyone know how to use the mask input option to smooth a part of the mesh inside the particle fluid surface node? I want to specify with a volume (ie. a bounding box) which part of the mesh to smooth or keep (instead of using the velocity or vorticity mask). I created the volume to mask with (just a box turned to vdb) as a separate OBJ, I am then object merging it and connecting it to the third input of the fluid surface node, then in the filtering tab in mask input I check it and put in the name of the volume. I have tried to do several different things on the volume itself (regular VDB, Fog VFB, etc.) and nothing seems to work or make any difference. When I turn visualize mask on all it shows is nothing is applied to it (ie. all of the surface has 0 smoothing applied to it) How do I properly use this feature and get the node to recognize the mask? Am I going about this the right way? Many thanks, CrownSplash Anim C.hiplc
  6. Hi all, I am encountering some strange artifacts while rendering a flip sim with mantra. I applied a platinum preset material to the mesh, environment light with HDRI and rendering with Mantra. You can see the artifacts all around the edge of the splash in the video below. I smoothed the final mesh quite a bit on the particlefluidsurface and it helped a bit, but still getting serious artifacts. I also tried remeshing and subdividing as a post process to the mesh it but that introduced new problems where the mesh would look totally unstable. My guess is that it might be doing that because of the constantly changing topology of the mesh? Maybe these meshes were not designed to be rendered with anything but a fluid like shader? Is there anything I can do about it? Attached video and file (using mesh from OUT node in Mesh obj node). Thanks, Top Down Test_1.mp4 CrownSplash Anim.hiplc
  7. Thanks Ill take a look
  8. Hi all, I am trying to create an effect where I can take any high rez model and smoothly reduce the number of polygons so that it is high rez and smooth on one side, and very low rez and faceted on the other. This is purely for aesthetic purposes, as I think that look would be quite cool. The area where the transition happens should be arbitrary (ie. a group of points) but to keep it simple initially let's just say the transition happens over the entire model on the Y axis, so at the top it has the highest density of triangles and at the bottom the lowest. My initial idea for accomplishing this was simple - put down the model, create an attribute called 'weight' and assign it to points according to their position in Y, then use a Polyreduce with the Attrib Weight set to 1. Alas, this did not work. It reduces the mesh alright, but instead of a smooth transition I get a very sharp transition from smooth to completely faceted. Worse, the keep% parameter doesnt really have much effect on how faceted it is after enabling the weight attribute. Can anyone think of a better way to do this? im sure there is.. Ideally looking for something that could almost be a digital asset and would allow the most flexibility in defining where and how the transition occurs (ie. painting the model, groups, point attributes, etc.) Attached is hip file and screenshot for reference. (p.s. it takes a few min to cook at the current model resolution). Thanks! Smooth to Facet_2.hiplc
  9. Thanks for the answer Marty. I will definitely give this a try. Even though most of my sim is about self collisions and not dynamic forces so I dont know how useful it will be for me. And as I mentioned in the Hforums, I am getting significantly different results in behavior when I change the rez of the mesh (apart from details), what Im looking for is the actual behavior of a high rez mesh. I do wish SES people would work on improving the speed instead of having to resort to these sorts of methods. Thanks in any case
  10. Hi, I have Houdini Indie, I am trying to simulate a cloth animation and am getting very, very slow results. I am doing a simple grid with 100 by 100 res fall into a smaller cube. On the default Finite Element Solver settings it is taking close to a minute per frame. If I increase the res of my mesh to 300 by 300 it gets close to 12 min per frame (I am running dual high end xeons, 256GB RAM, Quadro4200 and Tesla K40c). I am not even seeing good CPU utilization hovering between 9 and 12% I tried to disable substepping and setting the Max Iterations Linear Solve to 128 but it barely has any effect. Is this normal behavior or can I assume something is wrong?? Thanks,
  11. I'm wandering the same thing. Just started doing some cloth sims on H14 and was irritated and confused at the amount of time it was taking. I even thought maybe I was doing something wrong until I read this forum topic. Any word from SESI people on what the status on this is??