jonp Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Maybe I know just enough to not know anything about this... I was reading about radial basis function interpolation and in sample images it gives a really nice smooth result and seems to more intelligently fill in missing values than some other methods. However, it sounds like it takes a ton of memory to perform and is quite slow. Has anyone experimented with it? I've tested the Scipy implementation, which very rapidly runs out of memory and makes it impossible to use for real-world sized data. Cheers, Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonp Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 EDIT: Given that RBF is in fact used in mesh deformation, I should clarify that I'm interested in using it to convert particle simulations into volumess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.