Jump to content
caskal

Redshift sand sparks?

Recommended Posts

Hey magicians,

I'm new to redshift, I'm trying to generate some sort of glossy particles to add some sexyness, but I can't get the desired result.

What I tried is making 2 instances, 1 with the full point cloud, and the other with the glossy ones, but I can't make them to pop like the references.

References:

sand_ref.thumb.jpg.0883fd8eb6ef83a1a2334c4956e35c6c.jpg}

What I have so far:

mytry.thumb.jpg.d00c27f00eac053bc4909ae3bc5fbb82.jpg

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would almost say that is bordering on a compositing trick, something like a duplicate of the footage, only brightest part with the new layer in Add mode.

But here are a few things you might want to try...

If you are using area lights, tighten up their size a bit. You'll get a hotter white point out of a smaller area at the same intensity.

On the material reflection set it higher than 1.0 to brighten it up a bit but keep the next parameter very low to 0 or 0.1.(i.e. very little reflection blur)

Part of what I am seeing in the original is the DOF bokeh effect. So drop your DOF quite a bit more and maybe double the size of your subject/torus. You might pick up a little more lens action on a larger (or smaller) scaled object.

 

It is looking good though. Can't wait to see colors added in.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,
You can also try randomly setting the pscale of perhaps 5% of your particles to be bigger as well.

Or have a second set of particles that have planes/geo instanced to them with the cusp value set low (20 or lower) on a facet node, with 'post compute normals' selected.
This can help catch glints, especially if the faces are rotating.

Also, be sure that under the 'sample filtering' tab on the Redshift ROP settings, your 'Max Subsample Intensity' and the 'Max Secondary Ray Intensity' are set to at least 2 - this will aggressively clamp any hotspots when set lower.

5a42c25fb14c3_Screenshotfrom2017-12-2623-39-28.png.e5b823938b9b2524723e5f7f944dd313.png

Hope that helps!
Matt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Atom that was my first thought, I wasn't sure if was rendered or some compositing stuff, now you mention that workflow could work.

@Matt_K never tried that, will give a shot and post some gifs later

Thanks for the tips guys, much appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could output an AOV with something like 10-15% of the particles as a mask. use that in a grade node in your compositing software and dial them up.

let me know if you want an example file

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×