nezus

Well I think its simply impossible. My whole idea was based on the fact that F was a terminal symbol, which it is, but the graphic interpretation comes after the string generation. Meaning that my coordinates are evaluated only once and replaced everywhere in the string which explains the "stacking effect". I guess I'll have to go with an animated Carve SOP with a Copy SOP instancing stamped Lsystem.

Hi, not my first issue but first time here ! I'm trying to control the "trunk" of a l-system using a curve. I thought I could get away with tricks gathered from here and there but I was wrong I've tried different approaches first one is using a simple rule: Premise: A Rule #1: A=$(point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",0), point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",1), point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",2))F(((point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",0)-x)^2+(point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",1)-y)^2+(point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P",2)-z)^2)^0.5)A [/CODE] Which doesn't work and is kinda barbaric. I tried to simplify it by declaring new variables : [CODE] l: point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P", 0) m: point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P", 1) n: point("../my_control_curve", $F, "P", 2) [/CODE] so my rule became: [CODE] Premise: A Rule #1: A=$(l, m, n)F(((l-x)^2+(m-y)^2+(n-z)^2)^0.5)A [/CODE] or even more readable: [CODE] Premise: A Rule #1: A=B(l, m, n) Rule #2: B(i, j, k)=$(i, j, k)F(((i-x)^2+(j-y)^2+(k-z)^2)^0.5)A [/CODE] [EDIT] When if move forward in time, my first segement is moving to the corresponding point then the rest of the lsystem just stacks at this point. but still no luck. Any clues ? Thx for your time