catchyid 26 Posted August 4 Hi, I did a small experiment to understand the relationship between impacts generated on glue constraints and constraints strength. Below are two results: Experiment 1 : Glue strength = 20e9 --> max impacts on constraints = 2,879 Experiment 2: Glue strength = 20e1 --> max impacts on constraints = 286,801.8 My question: why impacts are function of Glue strength? As seen above, when I increase Glue Strength I get lower impacts? Should not impact be function of object mass, speed for example and not of glue strength? PS Attached is a simple hip file for the test... Thanks wall_to_destroy_t1.hip Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxyxxy 14 Posted November 19 Did you ever learn more about this? I'm also trying to wrap my head around how exactly glue/impacts/propagationiterates play with each other. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rayman 427 Posted November 20 On 8/4/2019 at 8:16 PM, catchyid said: My question: why impacts are function of Glue strength? They are not. You are comparing 2 completely different things - in one case constraints are starting to break - which means more free pieces to collide with = more impacts. Try the same experiment without breaking a single constraint - for example 20e5 vs 20e9. Do u see any difference? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
