Mechanica Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 Hey guys, trying to figure out something that's probably simple (I hope). I'm making a small edit to the sopsolver inside a POP source object. Just adding a wrangle to ignore some points, sometimes. Specifically, per substep. Unfortunately I can't figure out how to get the substep number from my wrangle. To recap, I have added an extra wrangle into the SOP Solver inside a POP Source node. Trying to access what substep the sim is on, and @SimFrame doesn't work (which makes sense). How should I do this? Thanks, -M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anim Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) create a parameter on your wrangle or anywhere in your SOP Solver and use this expression to get simulation time stamp("..", "ST", 0) timestep stamp("..", "TIMESTEP", 0) or simulation frame stamp("..", "ST", 0)/stamp("..", "TIMESTEP", 0) they will be only valid during siming, but you can set their defaults to nonzero if you want the to be specific values when observing inside of SOP Solver Edited March 30, 2020 by anim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mechanica Posted March 30, 2020 Author Share Posted March 30, 2020 Anim, thank you so much. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be working and I'm not sure why. There may be something fundamental I'm misunderstanding. Essentially, I have different groups of points and I only want one to emit per subframe. So I'm using a wrangle to delete all the other points when it's not their turn to emit. i.e. if (@ptID != ch("subframe") % 6){ removepoint(0, @ptnum); } Where "subframe" is my parameter with the aforementioned expression. Unfortunately the stamp never seems to pull in the data, so it just sits at the default value and never changes. Maybe my POP_source doesn't have the ST variable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anim Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 (edited) ".." would not point to POP Source, but SOP Solver, if it's on the parameter on the wrangle inside of SOP solver, but it shouldn't make a difference if it did though here is a simple file of similar setup that you probably have (SOP Solver inside POP Source) to show evaluated values as attribute I added another SOP Sover in there just to see it isolated, if you are using POP Source's SOP Solver that's fine too subframe_inside_sopsolver.hip Edited March 30, 2020 by anim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mechanica Posted March 30, 2020 Author Share Posted March 30, 2020 Thank you so much for taking the time to put that together for me. I really appreciate it. Reading back over your first reply I imagine my problem is coming from something here Quote "they will be only valid during siming, but you can set their defaults to nonzero if you want the to be specific values when observing inside of SOP Solver" So perhaps I really am getting it to evaluate on each substep, but the result ends up being that particles are only ever emitted from the same group (whatever the default value of the expression is). It sounds like I probably need to put my wrangle in the POP Solver instead of the POP Source. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anim Posted March 30, 2020 Share Posted March 30, 2020 you just have to trust it if you look at my example, you can clearly see that the substep value is being stored as an attribute, however you will never see any value other than 0 in the parameter itself so the same way I'm using the value in there you can use it to do whatever, since you see that it evaluates to the correct values during simulation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.