Jump to content

Is OpenCL 2.0 Faster than HFS OpenCL?

Recommended Posts

I wanted to play around with PyOpenCL in SOPs so I had to change out the symbolic link from HFS OpenCL to OpenCL 2.1 (from the Intel SDK) to get it to work. Upon testing to make sure I didn't completely break Houdini, I noticed that OpenCL performance in Heightfields and FLIP seemed noticeably faster. Is this possible, or is it just my imagination?

(cross posted on Facebook Houdini Artists)

Edited by shawn_kearney
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can always confront your imagination with reality measuring Houdini's performance in both cases. I wouldn't be surprised if lso OCL 1.2 code could run faster on OCL 2.0 driver. Aside of language's changes, new versions usually evolves compilation for better vectorization (I also imagine that dynamic parallelism might be used for work stealing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...