curveU Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 (edited) Hello everyone, I'm doing some test about volume smoke dynamics and now meet with one problem. I try to get a smoke with different colors. For example, I want the smoke to be more yellow when it has a higher position. I read one post from SESI forum, where David asked a similar question about "attribute per voxel". One developer replied the question but I don't quite understand the workflow. So if anyone here could let me know some way to render a smoke with different colors, that will help me a lot. Thanks, Edited May 24, 2008 by curveU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Gary Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 (edited) Two replies: If you want to do that in the viewport, this is not possible. Volumes are monochromatic! As for rendering. 1) At the shading level: the workflow is no different from surface shaders where you import/call attributes with a parameter VOP with the name of the proper attribute. 2) At the "volume level"( in SOPs): thing is there is no such thing as volume attributes. What you have instead is you must merge several volumes together ( like coming from a fluidsim, typically). And for each volume which plays the role of an additional attribute you use the primitive attribute "name" and set it to the name of your attribute ( 1 volume= 1 primitive, this gives you the "name of the volume") This is EQUIVALENT to volume attributes ( instead of "attaching" attributes to a volume, you merge several volumes together which will play the role of the attributes. note that volumes are scalar fields ( floats), so if you want vector attributes you need 3 volumes). Example: Coming from a fluid sim, if you want to use the burn field as the color attribute for your volume ( whose shape is represented by the density field), what you have to do is typically to merge the "smoke object" ( the "density" field) and the "fire object" ( the "burn" field) together. Fluid simulation sets the "name" attribute properly for you already ( you can check that in the geometry spreadsheet, you'll find "burn" and "density"). Note that you can import any other field with the Dop Import SOP, as long as it is displayed at the DOP level. If you want to use the input field "burn" as the input for color in your shader you just use a parameter VOP with the same parameter name: "burn", and you pipe it to the piece of code in the shader which computes final color. Names are not relevant, as long as the name in the parameter VOP and the name of the "field" match. Now if you want to create other volumes attributes from scratch ( without fluidsim) you create other volumes with proper "name" attributes at the SOP level ( with an AttribCreate SOP) and you merge them with the volume which will play the role of density. You can do that at the DOP level, create your own field with (SOP)scalar/VectorFields DOPs and the name of your field becomes the name of your "name" attribute when re-imported in SOPs. The same idea applies to motion blur and "texture advection". The whole thing may seem unintuitive. I thought that at the beginning, but it's actually perfectly consistent with the rest of fluid implementation This may change with H9.5 though. Hth David Edited May 25, 2008 by David Gary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zasid Posted May 25, 2008 Share Posted May 25, 2008 Hello David, Do we have any tutorials on it on ho to render smokes animations in Houdini??I think this is one of the area were not much has been their in term of resources.So there has been a lot of confusions about it. Thanks . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curveU Posted May 25, 2008 Author Share Posted May 25, 2008 Hello David, Thanks for your detailed explanation. It's very informative. I will try to do some test to see if I could get some results. The whole thing may seem unintuitive. I thought that at the beginning, but it's actually perfectly consistent with the rest of fluid implementationThis may change with H9.5 though. Yeah, I really hope the fuild dynamics part of Houdini could be improved in the coming version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.