eolophus Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 In the vellum constraint features masterclass, John Lynch says that FEM is more accurate for solving objects with high elasticity, but he doesn't elaborate on that. I'm curious about more specifically when you would reach for the FEM solver over vellum's tet softbodies. I am familiar with tet softbodies, but not with FEM. Is FEM better at achieving certain effects? Anything about the FEM workflow that is better in certain situations? Is FEM just more accurate from a technical perspective, or do you think it actually gives better results? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anim Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 FEM is certainly more physically accurate and it's possible to achieve very stiff materials that are independent of resolution while Vellum is not independent of geometry resolution (even though Automatic Mass computation helps a bit) and it's impossible to achieve completely stiff materials unless the resolution is very low overall Vellum is suitable for most softbody needs, however for proper muscle sim I'd think you'd want to go with FEM for example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.