Bricard Posted November 3, 2023 Share Posted November 3, 2023 Lately I have been learning the flip solver. I am concerned with one big difference with the pyro/vellum solver, which is that i could not reproduce what the flip solver does with a dop. The inside of the this solver is much more complex. I feel a bit insecure about this, I don't like being unable to reproduce what I learn here in a custom setup ( which I might need to do if I have to do a more custom simulation, with interactions with others solvers or whatever) and I don't like having a sim that automatically looks good but that i cannot fully control. How did you implement it in you workflows ? I guess you can customize a lot by editing fields before inputing them in the flip solver but would that be enough ? If anyone has advice it would be great but I would be glad as well to just hear your opinions or your experience with this change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paranoidx Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) You have not work on it long enough, need more practice to understand the whole stream. Basic and simple = slowly make the stream chain similar Flip shelf tool by its feature inside a SOP network without link around. Got to understand why it chain like that first. Flip contain particles + volume, the volume is based grid that advect the particles project on. In and out both are containing particles and volume. Repeat and repeat then you safe Edited January 14 by paranoidx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.