Jump to content

Melting geometry, UV issue...


Masoud

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Atom said:

One way is to try the opposite approach. Instead of trying to copy your UVs to new geometry, use the new geometry to deform the source model, which already has "good" UVs in place.

Untitled-1.jpg

ap_UV_Melting_010120.hipnc

 

 

Hi "Atom",

Thanks for reply, but I want to use that workflow in a Flip-Fluid simulation, so deforming the geometry using a "Point Deform" SOP, seems not a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went through this, trying to melt an iPhone model. Basically you promote all attributes to point, then after the simulation, you promote the attributes back to their appropriate context (i.e. UVs->Points->Vertex). Make sure you adjust the attribute forwarding fields on the compress node, as well as the surfacing node.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's different since transferring vertex UVs is not trivial and Attribute Transfer uses very naive approach that it guaranteed to not work if you have any seams 

the reason is that at the seam 2 or more vertices attached to the same point have different UV values, however since Attribute Transfer uses spatial proximity to sample values it will assign the same value to all vertices that share a point since they have the same P

you may have more success with GameDev UV Transfer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...