Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'upres'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • Lounge/General chat
    • Education
    • Jobs
    • Marketplace
  • Houdini
    • General Houdini Questions
    • Effects
    • Modeling
    • Animation & Rigging
    • Lighting & Rendering + Solaris!
    • Compositing
    • Games
    • Tools (HDA's etc.)
  • Coders Corner
    • HDK : Houdini Development Kit
    • Scripting
    • Shaders
  • Art and Challenges
    • Finished Work
    • Work in Progress
    • VFX Challenge
    • Effects Challenge Archive
  • Systems and Other Applications
    • Other 3d Packages
    • Operating Systems
    • Hardware
    • Pipeline
  • od|force
    • Feedback, Suggestions, Bugs

Product Groups

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


Name


Location


Interests

Found 10 results

  1. Hello, I have tried to replicate the videos down below. However I got an issue that the sim has a hard time to remain thickness/volume of the upres layer. I could kinda fix it when bringing up the reseeding (surface oversampling) to about 10, but that will change the volume of the sim. Does anyone have any ideas regarding that? https://vimeo.com/108888186 https://vimeo.com/638633520#t=71s
  2. i a doing a simple simulation of a viscous fluid and each time i upres and wait to cache the result is always really different. First of all the general motion of the fluid changes and seems to be less viscous The other problem is that the surface when meshing later seems thiner. All i changed was the particle separation from 0.05 to 0.02. (of course this number is referenced to the flip object the fluid source and the final meshing) I am new to fluid sims and i was wondering if there is a way to guide the high res simulation and match the velocities of the low res. that way i can keep my low res result in terms of general motion but get much higher detail of my fluid.
  3. Hey all I have some low-ish resolution VDB dust clouds created in C4D with the TurbulenceFD plugin. These contain velocity channels. So far, I'm just not satisfied with the overall detail. What I've done to try and increase detail is convert the VDBs to Volumes, Volume Resample them, then use Volume Velocity to add some curl noise. It's looks OK, but by no means what you would call a true Up-res, that uses existing velocity channels to increase detail in turbulent areas... So that's the question really. How do I take a pre-calculated VDB (not dynamic at all) and give it a high-res makeover? Any pointers would be appreciated. Please be aware that the overall motion has been signed off, so all that I should be changing at this point is detail. I would just do the Up-res in TurbulenceFD, but it's buggy as hell and wont work. Every day I get closer to ditching C4D entirely. Thanks!
  4. Hi all, is there a way to add details to Pop sim in Houdini like in this tutorial: Thanks thanks
  5. Is ist possible to make a simulation in embergen, export as vdb, import into houdini, and upres the simulation using gas upres? (you have density, temperature, vel, fuel and heat)
  6. (Solved) Hello, I have a lowres pyro container and for closup shot i want to upres only small part of it and save overall movements. How can I achieve it? Preview scene build from shelf. Thank you. upres_part.hip Solution: Ah, nevermind. Just add volumeresize and crop lowres volume to my area and same for object smoke.
  7. Hello guys, when i upresing pyro sim, CPU not calculating sim. it's spending 9 hours only 7 frames. i'm using Explicit Caches. Cached frame file size is 3GB. i don't know what should i do. Help me guys. Sorry my bad english....
  8. I've added the gas upres node in a duplicate of my dopnet (smoke simulation only no combustion). I have exported the vel, density fields for the original sim. Then I animate the absolute frame in the upres node (starts at 1- 50F and then slows down). However the retimed sim looks similar but more smooth out, like a mushroom cloud instead of thick and thin layers blending together. I tired to introduce some turbulence from the upres node but it doesnt solve the problem. It's as if the sim became more thicker and blobby. My only solution right now is retiming from the original sim via timescale animation and counteranimating dissipation, turbulence when the smoke slows down. Any ideas how I can do a proper retime with the gasupres node (also look at how the shelf tools set up the network).
  9. Hello everyone, I have been trying to use upres tool from the shelf. It works perfectly when my source for pryro is "fluid source" in SOP level. But when I change my sourcing method to particles the upres tool doesnt work. Does anyone have any solution or a different method to upres the pyro? I have attached my file as an example. Please let me know if anyone finds a solution. Thank you very much. Advait test_fire_v002.hip
  10. Hello OdForce! I have an issue with the initial state on the Pyro UPRES. The initial state from my LowRes sim doesn't seem to work with the UPRES Pyro solver. Instead of simulating from the Initial state it re-simulate from the beginning. I also tried to make another .sim file but now from the Upres DopNetwork and instead of continuing the sim( purpose of the initial state... ) it kind of glitching. Here's a flipbook------> https://www.dropbox....State_Weird.mov I could easily delete the glitching frames, probably ±10 frames(Scale time: 1) but am looking for a Slow-mo fire so I would have to delete maybe 40 frames or higher(Scale time: 0,2)with a High resolution. Is anyone has ever experienced this kind of problem? Thank you OdForce!
×
×
  • Create New...